Why should the law care about what I do behind closed doors?

Liberty is not boundless. It does have its limits.

The law shouldn't care (if you are a law abiding citizen) about who you take into the bedroom as long as they are consenting adults. How many guns you own. What you eat for supper. What kind of TV shows you watch. Whether you watch porn or not.

Society sets laws announcing those actions that it deems unacceptable in polite society. If evidence appears that causes a reasonable person to suspect that illegal activity is going on, society should investigate. Of course society might find itself having to jump through hoops by adhering to constitutional law. It cannot just invade your personal space and demand to know what you're up to just because they don't like you.

If all the American hundred millionaires and billionaires chipped in a modest 10% of their net worth to provide affordable housing to homeless families and other down and out persons, (like veterans), would this address the housing crisis?

You can stand on a public sidewalk and take pictures of my house. You can't walk into my house uninvited and start taking pictures.

If evidence arises that you are doing these things behind closed doors, don't you think the government has a moral obligation to investigate?

The law doesn't care about what you do behind closed doors as long as it is within the bounds of what the law allows.

People with COPD had more carbon in their lungs than smokers in study - The Washington Post

But what if you're raping little girls behind closed doors? Killing gay men? Watching child porn?

Your speech is free. But if it causes malicious harm to someone, you can be sued.

It shouldn't to a point.

Having read so much about Archie and Lilibet not actually existing, does anyone have any proof that they not only exist but that Meghan gave birth to them?